Originally, when mytekcontrols and I asked for forum, I thought I knew the answer. But I'm not so sure anymore. It seems like just about everything I write anymore qualifies. Perhaps it's just that I'm always writing re-useable code, but it feels like my file extension PBP is not the same as the PBP I bought. I have so many more functions available to me now because I write with the intention of not having to do it again. So the next program I write, if I need to do the same thing again, it's already there. Just include it and go.
But the question now is, have I really extended it, or am I just using the available features that allow re-usable code? Am I really just using PBP the way it was intended from the beginning? Let's say I had a way to buffer serial data so that the processor didn't need to twiddle it's thumbs waiting for the USART to send/receive something. Since PBP can't buffer serial data, does this Extend the capabilities of PBP even though you can't use HSERIN anymore? Or, is it just another example of using PBP as intended.
Now, what if you could tap into the data streams of HSERIN/OUT LCDIN/out etc. and create buffers for them? Would that be an file extension PBP doesn't allow that to happen normally?
But the question now is, have I really extended it, or am I just using the available features that allow re-usable code? Am I really just using PBP the way it was intended from the beginning? Let's say I had a way to buffer serial data so that the processor didn't need to twiddle it's thumbs waiting for the USART to send/receive something. Since PBP can't buffer serial data, does this Extend the capabilities of PBP even though you can't use HSERIN anymore? Or, is it just another example of using PBP as intended.
Now, what if you could tap into the data streams of HSERIN/OUT LCDIN/out etc. and create buffers for them? Would that be an file extension PBP doesn't allow that to happen normally?
Komentar
Posting Komentar